Walter Energy Cites 'Serious Omissions? in Audley Capital Proxy Statement

Walter Energy, Inc. (NYSE: WLT) (TSX: WLT) today issued a letter to its
shareholders raising serious concerns about Audley Capital′s slate of
nominees and highlighting the steps underway by the Company′s Board and
new management team to increase shareholder value.

The letter from Chairman Michael T. Tokarz and CEO and Director Walter
J. Scheller III highlights 'troubling aspects? about Audley′s campaign
to replace five of its nine independent directors, including the fact
that Audley′s proxy statement contains serious omissions regarding the
background and history of its nominees.These omissions include
insider trading charges, deficient governance, and misrepresentations of
experience.

Walter Energy said the Board′s Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee reviewed the Audley slate and determined that individually and
collectively they lack the qualifications and experience to be suitable
Board candidates. Walter Energy has a balanced mix of experience and
expertise on its Board, and four of the 10 current directors have joined
within the past two years.

'We are intensely focused on enhancing shareholder value by reducing
debt levels, continuing to reduce SG&A expenses, and identifying
alternatives for underperforming assets,? the letter states. 'These
initiatives are consistent with our objective of optimizing our
portfolio and ensuring that each of our operations is cash flow positive
and on a clear path to profitability under current market conditions and
outlook.?

The letter concludes: 'Over the years your Board has created long term
value for all stockholders with judgment and integrity. We recognize and
accept the challenge of responding to the recent and dramatic decline in
met coal pricing that has affected every company in this industry. Your
Board and management have taken every reasonable step to respond to that
trend and to position the Company for future profitable growth as
conditions improve. That work should accrue to your benefit, not that of
others. Now is not the time to reverse course.?

Text of March 25 letter from Messrs. Tokarz and Scheller to Walter
Energy shareholders:

Dear Fellow Walter Energy Shareholders:

We have been pleased to speak with many of you over the past few weeks
and, as always, we are appreciative of your insights and input. During
our discussions, we have reviewed the ways in which your Board and
management are fully aligned in positioning the Company for vigorous and
profitable growth in anticipation of the recovery of the met coal
market. We have an experienced management team in place that has safely
increased production to a record level while curtailing low margin
tonnage, improving average met coal cost per ton of production as well
as reducing total SG&A expenses, tightening capital spending, improving
liquidity, and aggressively pursuing debt reduction.

We are intensely focused on enhancing shareholder value by reducing debt
levels, continuing to reduce SG&A expenses, and identifying alternatives
for underperforming assets. These initiatives are consistent with our
objective of optimizing our portfolio and ensuring that each of our
operations is cash flow positive and on a clear path to profitability
under current market conditions and outlook.

Your Board has provided invaluable oversight of our proactive approach
to portfolio and cost management. Moreover, our commitment to decisive
change in pursuit of value creation is reflected in the Board′s balance
and composition. Four of the 10 current directors have joined within the
past two years, adding important new perspectives and skills to
historical knowledge and continuity of leadership.

With this backdrop, it is unfortunate that an offshore hedge fund,
Audley Capital, is seeking five out of nine independent Board seats at
our April 25^th Annual Meeting of Shareholders ? threatening
to derail our new management team and the important progress we have
made thus far.

Audley owns less than one-tenth of one percent of the Company′s shares,
and only one individual on Audley′s slate claims beneficial ownership of
any shares. This is not evidence of an alignment with and long-term
commitment to your best interests. We also want to bring to your
attention other troubling aspects about their campaign:

• Audley′s proxy statement contains serious omissions regarding the
  background and history of its nominees ? These include insider
  trading charges, deficient governance, and misrepresentations of their
  experience.
  
• Audley′s nominees lack the credentials we require of our directors
  ? The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of your Board
  has carefully considered Audley′s slate and determined that,
  collectively and individually, they lack the qualifications and
  experience to lead a multi-billion dollar New York and Toronto Stock
  Exchange-listed company such as Walter Energy.
  
• Audley is focused on short term gains at the expense of other
  shareholders ? The hedge fund′s prior track record with Walter
  Energy underscores in our view its opportunistic, 'hit and run?
  approach in driving up the stock price with public statements in order
  to take immediate profits.
  

Audley offers no specific plan that differs from what your Board is
already doing, and its efforts to install an opposing slate could
jeopardize our strong operational momentum as our efforts gain traction.
We encourage you to vote for the Company′s nominees today
by telephone, by Internet, or by signing and dating the enclosed WHITE
proxy card and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided.

YOUR BOARD AND MANAGEMENT HAVE BEEN EXECUTING
ON A COMPREHENSIVE BUSINESS PLAN; AUDLEY IS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO
PROPOSE ANYTHING NEW

Audley′s plan to improve the Company offers nothing the Company is not
already doing. Its four elements ? reducing debt, reviewing SG&A and
cost control, stabilizing senior management, and improving operational
performance ? are already areas of intense focus for our Board and
management where we either have made real progress with further
improvement already targeted or, in the case of stabilizing senior
management, have completed the task.

• Debt reduction underway. Our first priority is debt reduction
  and improving our liquidity and debt maturity profile. To that end,
  last week we raised $450 million of new senior unsecured notes which
  will extend our debt maturities and increase our liquidity. The issue
  was very well received, evidencing the credit market′s favorable view
  of our progress, and priced at a lower interest rate than our issue
  last November.
  
• Significant cost improvements. In 2012 we reduced SG&A by 19%,
  and we have targeted an additional reduction in SG&A expenses in 2013.
  We reduced average met coal cash cost per ton by 6% compared to 2011,
  and by 16% in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to the fourth
  quarter of 2011.
  
• Able and experienced management team in place. The Board named
  Walt Scheller Chief Executive Officer in September 2011, and during
  2012 we appointed to our senior management team a mix of highly
  experienced external and internal executives.
  
• Strengthened operational performance. We safely increased
  production of met coal by 35% to a record 11.7 metric tons in 2012,
  developed our capacity to produce in excess of 15 million metric tons
  when market conditions warrant, and curtailed production at low margin
  mines. Most recently we announced we will be idling our Willow Creek
  mine in Canada and will be closing our North River mine in Alabama
  ahead of schedule.
  

Audley offers no concrete ideas in any of these areas.

AUDLEY′S NOMINEES ARE FLAWED AND LACK THE
NECESSARY RECORDS OF SUCCESSFUL STEWARDSHIP

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Walter Energy′s
Board reviewed the qualifications of the Audley nominees as part of its
established nominee review process. The Committee concluded that the
Audley nominees did not meet the Company′s standards for directorship.
The Audley nominees lack the track record and credentials that would
qualify them to be directors of a company with Walter Energy′s
financial, industrial, and market profile and governance requirements.

Material facts were also omitted from Audley′s proxy statement about
these nominees, all of which are important for you to know:

Julian Treger: Questions about 'hit and run?
track record

Julian Treger has a history of opportunistic, short-term investing at
the expense of other shareholders.

In September 2010, Mr. Treger put his obligations as a director of
Western Coal aside in the interest of a making a profit for Audley,
resigning as a director of Western Coal so that he could solicit offers
for the large bloc of Western Coal shares owned by Audley. He ultimately
agreed to sell the bulk of this bloc to Walter Energy for cash in
November 2010. This was prior to and not conditioned upon Western Coal
entering into an acquisition agreement with your Company, which did not
occur until December 2010.

Less than a year later, when he held shares of Walter Energy common
stock in the aftermath of the Company′s acquisition of Western Coal, Mr.
Treger decided to profit from self-created publicity at the expense of
Walter Energy′s public investors and at the risk of destabilizing the
Company.

On Sunday, July 17, 2011, Mr. Treger sent a letter marked 'Private &
Confidential? to your Board calling for the Company′s sale, asserting
that the Company was worth twice what it was trading for at the time and
requesting a response by August 5^th. The next day, Monday,
July 18, he publicly disclosed that letter, without allowing the Company
to consider or respond to it. To take advantage of the sharp increase in
our stock price following his disclosure, Audley immediately began
selling its shares of Walter Energy′s common stock and continued to do
so over the course of the first four days of that week -- selling
300,000 shares, or 33% of his holdings, between July 18 and July 21. By
the end of October 2011, Audley had sold nearly all of its remaining
holdings in Walter Energy.

Audley′s proxy statement seeks to create the impression that its sales
followed a decision by your Board not to pursue a sale of the Company.
However, the facts tell a different story. Mr. Treger′s repeated
episodes of opportunism are directly contrary to the values of the
Company and show a disregard of the interests of you, its shareholders.

Nor have Audley′s strategies led to sustained profit making at other
companies. The Audley proxy statement lists two public companies of
which Mr. Treger is a director, Whetstone Minerals Ltd. and Firestone
Diamonds. Since he began his tenure at Whetstone in 2011, that company′s
stock price has declined by 50%. Since he began his tenure at Firestone
in 2012, Firestone′s stock price has declined by 38%.

Mr. Treger′s self-interested, profit-taking focus with respect to your
Company continues to this day. In its proxy statement, Audley disclosed
a side agreement with another hedge fund that may entitle Audley to fees
to the extent that hedge fund profits from undisclosed investments in
Walter Energy stock. Audley has not disclosed the terms of its deal, so
we do not know how this aligns -- or misaligns -- the interests of
Audley and its nominees with other shareholders, who have no such
arrangement.

Robert H. Stan: Questions about insider trading
charges

Mr. Stan is currently defending himself against charges of insider
trading, and tipping his wife so she could engage in insider trading, in
the stock of a company of which he was Chairman and CEO.

On December 5, 2011, the Alberta Securities Commission charged that Mr.
Stan and his wife engaged in transactions in the stock and options of
Grande Cache Coal Corporation at a time when they were aware that the
company would fall short of its forecasted sales by almost 40%. It
alleged that their transactions occurred 'while they were in a special
relationship with Grande Cache and with knowledge of a material fact or
change with respect to Grande Cache that had not been generally
disclosed,? in violation of Alberta′s Securities Act. On September 19,
2012, a hearing panel denied Mr. Stan′s request for an order dismissing
one of the allegations against him. It is our understanding that these
charges remain unresolved.

It is particularly troubling that Audley has not only failed to disclose
the existence of these pending charges when asking you to vote for Mr.
Stan, but has specifically held him out in its proxy statement as
well-suited to 'assist the Board in its compliance and governance
discussions and strategies.?

Audley′s promotion of Mr. Stan has little basis, even without regard to
the insider trading charges against him. Spruce Bluff Resource Ltd, of
which the proxy statement describes Mr. Stan as Chairman and Director,
is a small entity formed last year by Mr. Stan, in which he and his wife
are the sole directors. The proxy statement also lists Mr. Stan′s
service on the board of directors of Whetstone Minerals Ltd. (with Mr.
Treger). However, during his time on the board, the company′s stock
price has fallen precipitously, losing more than 97% of its value.

Larry M. Clark, Jr.: Questions about lack of
relevant experience

Larry M. Clark′s principal business experience is essentially working
for a hedge fund, Harbinger Capital Partners. To the best of our
knowledge, he has no substantial experience as a manager, director or
leader of a coal company.

The Audley proxy statement notes Mr. Clark′s experience as an investor.
It omits mention of his public acknowledgement that he was fired from a
hedge fund job after causing accounts he managed to lose $250 million
dollars in 45 minutes.

It is our understanding that, during Mr. Clark′s time at Harbinger, he
spearheaded Harbinger′s investment in African Medical Investments and
served on that company′s board of directors. That investment resulted in
significant losses for the fund. During Mr. Clark′s tenure on the board
of African Medical Investments, the company′s stock fell by
approximately 70%.

When he left Harbinger in 2011, Mr. Clark attempted to start a hedge
fund, Balantrove Management, LLC. He publicly stated a goal of raising
between $500 million and $1 billion. However, he was able to raise only
a small fraction of that amount. Reportedly, Balantrove now has assets
under management of $760,000 and currently describes itself as a
'corporate advisory business catering to small and middle-market
resource and energy companies.?

Audley also lists Mr. Clark′s service on the board of directors of
Ecometals Ltd. as a qualification. However, he served on that board for
only a month, from November to December 2012, at which time he did not
stand for re-election. This unusually short stint as a director deserves
an explanation, which the proxy statement does not provide, and is
certainly not a credential establishing his Board experience.

Mark H. Lochtenberg: Questions about lax
corporate governance

Mr. Lochtenberg′s principal employment for the last eight years has been
with Cockatoo Coal Limited, an Australian mining company of which he has
served as managing director and, for the last year, executive chairman.

Mr. Lochtenburg′s testimony in litigation in Australia concerning his
activities on behalf of Cockatoo Coal casts serious doubt on his
qualifications in the area of corporate governance. The litigation was
brought by a minority shareholder in a company, Baralaba Coal Property
Ltd., in which Cockatoo owned the majority interest. Mr. Lochtenberg was
one of three directors of Baralaba appointed by Cockatoo. The minority
shareholder had two appointed directors. On cross-examination Mr.
Lochtenberg conceded that he had assumed the title of managing director
of Baralaba without being properly appointed by the board, failed to
hold directors meetings for nearly a year, failed to keep minutes of the
decisions made by the directors, and failed to provide operating
information requested by the minority directors. He was asked, 'So when
you say the affairs of Baralaba are in disarray, that′s only because you
[and the other two Cockatoo-appointed directors] have chosen to ignore
what would be basic rules of corporate governance, correct?? He
responded, 'Correct.?

A command of and commitment to sound corporate governance should be a
pre-requisite to serve on your behalf on Walter Energy′s Board. An
individual who has admitted to ignoring the basic rules of corporate
governance does not meet this standard.

In addition, the Audley proxy statement describes Cockatoo as 'a
publicly traded metallurgical coal producer,? the same business as
Walter Energy. Yet the proxy statement also claims that 'Mr.
Lochtenberg′s other activities in the coal industry are not believed to
be competitive with the business of the Company.? Shareholders of Walter
Energy are entitled to an explanation of the basis for this conclusion.

Cockatoo Coal′s share price has not performed well during Mr.
Lochtenberg′s tenure. Since he joined that company as one of three
managing directors in January 2005, its stock price has declined by 59%.
Since he became executive chairman in April 2012, it has declined by 71%.

Edward Scholtz: Questions about leadership
credentials

The description of Mr. Scholtz′s experience in the proxy contains
significant inaccuracies with respect to his leadership positions. The
proxy states that 'Mr. Scholtz also currently serves as a director of
Talon Metals Corp., a publicly traded mineral exploration company, where
he serves on the audit committee.? That company′s website does not list
Mr. Scholtz as a director or committee member, and contains a news
release stating that he left the company′s employ on February 9, 2012.
In fact, Mr. Scholtz served as the president and CEO of Talon, but held
that position for only eight months. During his brief tenure at Talon,
its share price dropped by 57%.

Audley also represents that Mr. Scholtz served as the 'Chief Operating
Officer of CIC Energy Corp., a publicly traded coal and energy company,
from 2008 to 2012.? That company′s disclosures indicate that this, too,
is incorrect. According to CIC′s annual reports, another individual held
the position of COO from January 2007 through December 2010. Mr. Scholtz
was apparently the COO of a division of CIC, not the parent public
company, during this period. Finally, Audley lists as a credential Mr.
Scholtz′s time as COO of Jindal Africa. Jindal purchased CIC, Mr.
Scholtz′s employer, in 2012. His tenure at Jindal Africa lasted only
three months, after which Mr. Scholtz left the company.

WALTER ENERGY NOMINEES ARE HIGHLY CREDENTIALED
AND FOCUSED ON SHAREHOLDER VALUE CREATION

Over the years your Board has created long term value for all
stockholders with judgment and integrity. We recognize and accept the
challenge of responding to the recent and dramatic decline in met coal
pricing that has affected every company in this industry. Your Board and
management have taken every reasonable step to respond to that trend and
to position the Company for future profitable growth as conditions
improve. That work should accrue to your benefit, not that of others.
Now is not the time to reverse course.

Your Board has put the Company on a path to greater long-term
profitability as market conditions improve. Replacing five out of nine
independent members with nominees who offer no new ideas to strengthen
the Company, and whose past records raise substantial doubts as to their
suitability and qualifications for the Board, would not be in your best
interest. We urge you to vote for the Board′s nominees. We also look
forward to continuing our dialogue with you.

Your vote is important in this election, and we urge you to vote
TODAY so that your voice is heard.To elect the Walter Energy
Board′s nominees, we encourage you to vote today by telephone, by
Internet, or by signing and dating the enclosed WHITE proxy card and
returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided. We also urge you
to discard any proxy card sent to you by Mr. Treger or Audley Capital.

Sincerely,

Michael T. Tokarz, Chairman of the Board

Walter J. Scheller, III, Chief Executive Officer and Director

About Walter Energy

Walter Energy is the world's leading, publicly traded 'pure-play'
metallurgical coal producer for the global steel industry with strategic
access to high-growth steel markets in Asia, South America and Europe.
The Company also produces thermal coal, anthracite, metallurgical coke
and coal bed methane gas. Walter Energy employs approximately 4,100
employees and contractors with operations in the United States, Canada
and United Kingdom. For more information about Walter Energy, please
visit www.walterenergy.com.

Safe Harbor Statement

Except for historical information contained herein, the statements in
this release are forward-looking and made pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and
may involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking
statements are based on information available to management at the time,
and they involve judgments and estimates. Forward-looking statements
include expressions such as 'believe,' 'anticipate,' 'expect,'
'estimate,' 'intend,' 'may,' 'plan,' 'predict,' 'will,' and similar
terms and expressions. These forward-looking statements are made based
on expectations and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and
are subject to various risks, uncertainties and factors relating to our
operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to
predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our
actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or
implied by these forward-looking statements. The following factors are
among those that may cause actual results to differ materially from our
forward-looking statements: unfavorable economic, financial and business
conditions; the global economic crisis; market conditions beyond our
control; prolonged decline in the price of coal; decline in global coal
or steel demand; prolonged or dramatic shortages or difficulties in coal
production; our customer's refusal to honor or renew contracts; our
ability to collect payments from our customers; inherent risks in coal
mining such as weather patterns and conditions affecting production,
geological conditions, equipment failure and other operational risks
associated with mining; title defects preventing us from (or resulting
in additional costs for) mining our mineral interests; concentration of
our mining operations in limited number of areas; a significant
reduction of, or loss of purchases by, our largest customers;
unavailability of cost-effective transportation for our coal;
significant increase in competitive pressures and foreign currency
fluctuations; significant cost increases and delays in the delivery of
raw materials, mining equipment and purchased components; availability
of adequate skilled employees and other labor relations matters;
inaccuracies in our estimates of our coal reserves; greater than
anticipated costs incurred for compliance with environmental liabilities
or limitations on our abilities to produce or sell coal; our ability to
attract and retain key personnel; future regulations that increase our
costs or limit our ability to produce coal; new laws and regulations to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions that impact the demand for our coal
reserves; adverse rulings in current or future litigation; inability to
access needed capital; availability of licenses, permits, and other
authorizations may be subject to challenges; risks associated with our
reclamation and mine closure obligations; failure to meet project
development and expansion targets; risks associated with operating in
foreign jurisdictions; risks related to our indebtedness and our ability
to generate cash for our financial obligations; downgrade in our credit
rating; our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates to
promote growth; our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions;
volatility in the price of our common stock; our ability to pay regular
dividends to stockholders; costs related to our post-retirement benefit
obligations and workers' compensation obligations; our exposure to
litigation; and other risks and uncertainties including those described
in our filings with the SEC. Forward-looking statements made by us in
this release, or elsewhere, speak only as of the date on which the
statements were made. You are advised to read the risk factors in our
most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent filings
with the SEC, which are available on our website at www.walterenergy.com
and on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and it is
impossible for us to predict these events or how they may affect us or
our anticipated results. We have no duty to, and do not intend to,
update or revise the forward-looking statements in this release, except
as may be required by law. In light of these risks and uncertainties,
readers should keep in mind that any forward-looking statement made in
this press release may not occur. All data presented herein is as of the
date of this release unless otherwise noted.

Important Additional Information

On March 8, 2013, Walter Energy filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ('SEC?), a definitive proxy statement (as it may be amended
or supplemented, the 'Proxy Statement?) concerning the proposals to be
presented at Walter Energy′s 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in
connection with the solicitation of proxies from Walter Energy′s
stockholders. The Proxy Statement contains important information about
Walter Energy and the 2013 Annual Meeting. In addition, Walter Energy
files annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. INVESTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS ARE STRONGLY
URGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD AND OTHER
DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY BECAUSE
THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT WALTER ENERGY AND THE PROPOSALS
TO BE PRESENTED AT THE 2013 ANNUAL MEETING. These documents are
available free of charge at the SEC′s website (www.sec.gov)
or from Walter Energy at our investor relations website www.investorrelations.walterenergy.com).
The contents of the websites referenced herein are not deemed to be
incorporated by reference into the Proxy Statement.

Certain Information Regarding Participants

Walter Energy, its directors and certain of its officers may be deemed
to be participants in the solicitation of Walter Energy′s stockholders
in connection with its 2013 Annual Meeting. Information regarding the
names, affiliations and direct and indirect interests (by security
holdings or otherwise) of these persons is found in the Proxy Statement
for the 2013 Annual Meeting, which is filed with the SEC. Additional
information regarding these persons can also be found in other documents
filed by Walter Energy with the SEC. Stockholders are able to obtain a
free copy of the Proxy Statement and other documents filed by Walter
Energy with the SEC from the sources listed above.

For media:

Ruth Pachman, 212-521-4891

ruth-pachman@kekst.com

or

For
investors:

Mark Tubb, 205-745-2627

mark.tubb@walterenergy.com