• Montag, 25 November 2024
  • 09:45 Uhr Frankfurt
  • 08:45 Uhr London
  • 03:45 Uhr New York
  • 03:45 Uhr Toronto
  • 00:45 Uhr Vancouver
  • 19:45 Uhr Sydney

Heron Resources Announces Woodlawn Feasibility Study on Track

09.09.2015  |  FSCwire

Sydney, Australia (FSCwire) - Heron Resources Ltd. (ASX:HRR TSX:HER, “Heron” or the “Company”) is pleased to provide an update on progress with the Feasibility Study for the Company’s advanced Woodlawn Zinc-Copper Project (“Project”), which commenced immediately following the completion of Heron’s highly successful Preliminary Economic Assessment[1] (“PEA”) in June 2015[2].

Feasibility Study Progress

The Feasibility Study will deliver a maiden Mineral Reserve statement for the Woodlawn Underground Project (“WUP”) and an updated Mineral Reserve statement for the Woodlawn Retreatment Project (“WRP”), together with a combined mine plan, plant and infrastructure designs, capital and operating cost estimates, and environmental, social, and economic considerations.  The Feasibility Study is geared towards achieving a low cost project that will facilitate an efficient funding structure for the Project via a combination of debt and equity.

Heron’s recently appointed Chief Operating Officer, Andrew Lawry, said:

I have been impressed with the quality of the work that the team has achieved during the PEA and this, together with the location advantages of the site, our symbiotic relationship with Veolia, and the large volume of advanced technical work which has previously been completed for the tailings project, is making the process of the combined Feasibility Study more straightforward than might normally be the case.

We are focused on achieving a bankable study outcome in as short a time as possible, and we are tailoring the technical work to deliver this.  I am confident, given the base levels of study input into the Feasibility Study, that the outcomes and timescales are achievable and that Woodlawn will demonstrate very sound economics to a bankable level.

The Feasibility Study results are expected to be released to the market in the second quarter of calendar 2016.

Stage 2 Drilling

The Phase II drilling program (comprising approximately 19,000m of diamond drilling) at Woodlawn is now 65% complete, with 12,400 metres having been completed, reflecting on-time and on-budget progress.

 

[1] IMPORTANT NOTE: A Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) is a formal study in standard form prescribed by Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) which includes an economic analysis of the potential viability of Mineral Resources, but which is not a pre-feasibility study or feasibility study.  In accordance with Canadian requirements in relation to preliminary economic assessments, the Company advises that the preliminary economic assessment is preliminary in nature, that it includes some Inferred Mineral Resources considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorised as Mineral Reserves, and that there is no certainty that the economics set out in the preliminary economic assessment will be realised.  Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

[2] Refer to the ASX/TSX release of 22nd April 2015 entitled ‘Preliminary Economic Assessment Delivers Strong Business Case for the Woodlawn Zinc-Copper Project’, and that of 2nd June 2015 entitled “Release of Woodlawn Preliminary Economic Assessment”.

The objective of the Phase II drilling is to delineate sufficient Measured and Indicated Resources which can then be developed into a maiden Mineral Reserve within the Feasibility Study, allowing the Project to support commercial bank debt and, subject to funding, proceed with detailed engineering and construction.  In undertaking this, the Company has focused on minimising the time and cost associated with the program by targeting relatively shallow positions with in-fill drilling required to upgrade a portion of the 6.5Mt underground Mineral Resource to Indicated Resources classification, as well as to test shallow mineralised positions that have the potential to provide ready-access production in the early part of the planned underground operations.

A large number of high grade intercepts have been recorded during the program to date, including:

Kate Lens Extensions:

  • 7.1m @ 40.6% ZnEq from 340m, (16.1% Zn, 0.9% Cu, 11.3% Pb, 3.5g/t Au, 254g/t Ag), WNDD0029
  • 4.8m @ 11.0% ZnEq from 324m  (7.6% Zn, 0.4% Cu, 0.9% Pb, 0.7g/t Au, 37g/t Ag), WNDD0029
  • 20.5m @ 20.7% ZnEq) from 383m (8.1% Zn, 2.4% Cu, 2.9% Pb, 0.8g/t Au, 68g/t Ag), WNDD0031
  • 12.0m @ 13.7% ZnEq from 405m (4.7% Zn, 2.2% Cu, 0.8% Pb, 0.8g/t Au, 22g/t Ag), WNDD0032
  • 34.0m @ 20.8% ZnEq from 326m  (10.0% Zn, 1.1% Cu, 3.5% Pb, 1.6g/t Au, 97g/t Ag), WNDD0033
  • 18.9m @ 7.8% ZnEq from 390m (0.4% Zn, 2.1% Cu, 0.6g/t Au, 8.0g/t Ag), WNDD0035 ;
  • 35.5m @ 11.2% ZnEq from 348m (5.1% Zn, 0.8% Cu, 1.3% Pb, 0.9g/t Au, 62g/t Ag), WNDD0037;
  • 19.8m @ 9.9% ZnEq from 376m (0.7% Zn, 2.6% Cu, 0.2% Pb, 0.7g/t Au, 8g/t Ag), WNDD0038.

Drill samples of several massive sulphide intercepts are progressing through the assay laboratory; with results pending.

H Lens Up-dip Extension:

  • 1.7m @ 39.8% ZnEq from 108.7m  (3.5% Zn, 6.8% Cu, 4.9% Pb, 3.9g/t Au, 213g/t Ag), WNDD0026
  • 0.75m @ 51.5% ZnEq from 103.8m  (5.6% Zn, 8.1% Cu, 6.8% Pb, 3.6g/t Au, 398g/t Ag), WNDD0027

E Lens Extension:

  • 2.5m @ 11.7% ZnEq from 151.3m  (1.9% Zn, 1.2% Cu, 0.3% Pb, 3.4g/t Au, 16.5g/t Ag), WNDD0025

Figure1:  Kate Lens Long-Section looking east.  Down-hole intercept thickness and ZnEq grade contoured to show relative accumulation of metals across the lens.  Current resource outline is shown for reference.

To view the graphic in its original size, please click here

The program has successfully confirmed the predicted up- and down-plunge extensions to the Kate Lens and, along with a number of contiguous wide drill intercepts, is expected to increase the volume of the known mineralisation within the Kate Lens.  Partially offsetting this success, the deeper portion of G Lens has returned lesser volumes than expected. 

Overall, the Company believes that the results for the lenses being drilled appear to be globally consistent with the expectations from the PEA.

Targets from DHEM Surveying

Downhole electromagnetic (DHEM) surveying continues to be used as a tool to develop drill targets and to refine existing drilling programs.  Recent surveys as part of the Feasibility Study program have provided a large number of new EM plates that have been modelled within both shallow and deeper areas within the mine.

Figure2:  Oblique Cross Section through the Woodlawn system showing the recently modelled DHEM plates and target zones. 

To view the graphic in its original size, please click here

The shallow targets (<500m) are being tested as part of the ongoing program and have the potential to provide modest size but potentially high grade additional Mineral Resources to the system.  These include the E, G, H and Lisa Lenses.

In addition, deeper targets, which have been refined from the surveys of drill hole WNDD0030 (approx. 700m), plus surveys from earlier drilled holes, provide exciting vectors for potential depth extensions to both the Kate Lens and the C Lens (Figure 2).

The majority of massive sulphide lenses in the Woodlawn system have substantial down-plunge components, and with the tenor of the known Kate Lens mineralisation, there is a strong possibility that this lens too continues at depth.  The two EM plates identified, which occur around 60m in the footwall compared to the upper Kate Lens plane, and the copper rich mineralisation intersected in 2010 in drill hole WLTD010 which assayed 7m @ 2.1% Cu from 538m downhole, provide strong encouragement for this model.  If proven, the Kate Lens down-plunge extensions could provide for significantly increased tonnes per vertical metre within the 500-700m range below surface, which is within the existing PEA mine plan design.

The new EM plates which sit directly below the current C Lens position also provide encouragement that this lens may continue at depth. Very little systematic exploration has been undertaken within the Woodlawn mineralised system to explore for extensions at depth (>700m).  Previous, limited, exploration drilling at the immediate base of the current C Lens suggested that the system could be pinching out.  The EM plates indicate that the lens may swell beyond that expected pinch point, which would be similar to the behaviour of the C Lens in shallower positions. 

The footwall EM plate below the C Lens, together with other signs of footwall mineralisation further up the system, provides early encouragement for the potential discovery of new mineralisation to the south of the current C Lens.

Importantly, management holds the view that the “starter underground case” comprising approximately 7 years of underground plant feed which was presented in the PEA should be able to be significantly extended through continued exploration.  The attractive EM targets at-depth provide evidence in support of this position.

Mineral Resources and Reserves Definition

Work on updated Mineral Resources for the WRP and WUP is under way.

For the WRP, a new JORC 2012 compliant Mineral Resource is in the final stages of being generated.  The Mineral Resource estimation will incorporate all the historic drilling which was undertaken after the previous Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve were published.  These results will be published shortly via a NI 43-101 Technical Report. 

An update to the WUP Mineral Resource will be undertaken following the completion of the Phase II drilling programme and will be published, along with the maiden Mineral Reserve for the WUP and an updated Mineral Reserve for the WRP, in the Feasibility Study.

Metallurgical Test Work

Testwork is ongoing at Australian Minmet Metallurgical Laboratories (“AMML”), supervised by GR Engineering Services Limited (“GRES”) and Mr Rod Elvish, Heron’s independent consultant.  The program has a focus on variability test work and the testing of different blends of underground and tailings material which will be processed as part of the ramp-up of the plant and underground operations.

Process and Plant Engineering

GRES have now completed a report to update the 2012 Front End Engineering Design study (“FEED”) capital and operating cost estimates for the Woodlawn Retreatment Project (the “2015 FEED Update”). This update considered a plant layout that could incorporate the additional equipment required for the co-treatment of underground ore at a later date and forms the basis for understanding the project development costs for a staged development option at Woodlawn. All estimates have been provided at +/-20%.

The capital estimates for the WRP components of the process plant have reduced slightly compared to the PEA estimates.  A summary of the GRES estimates (with Heron additions as marked) is provided below.  It is pleasing to note that the slight reduction in capital has been achieved despite a movement in the base AUD/USD exchange rate basis from 0.80 in the PEA to 0.73 in the 2015 FEED Update.

Pre-Production Capital A$M

PEA

FEED

Delta

 

 WRP mining equipment

1.82

1.82

0.00

Heron PEA estimate

 TSF4

1.57

1.57

0.00

Heron PEA estimate

 Owners costs

1.92

1.92

0.00

Heron PEA estimate

 200 - earthworks

0.51

0.51

0.00

 

 311 - reclamation & screening

1.59

1.53

-0.06

 

 334 - regrind

9.83

12.19

2.36

 

 336 - flotation

27.83

22.42

-5.42

 

 342 - thickening, filtering and storage

7.56

6.71

-0.84

 

 360 - reagents

3.09

2.97

-0.11

 

 370 - power & reticulation

8.64

12.39

3.75

 

 391 - raw water supply

0.64

0.79

0.16

 

 400 & 402 - tailings & tailings return water

1.73

1.76

0.03

 

 420 - compressed air

0.46

0.49

0.03

 

 430 - admin buildings

1.23

1.23

0.00

 

 440 - workshop / stores

1.15

1.15

0.00

 

 442 - laboratory

0.21

0.21

0.00

 

 499 - piping

5.51

7.27

1.76

 

 804 - construction equipment

3.83

3.46

-0.37

 

 500 - engineering

10.21

8.90

-1.31

 

 510 - commissioning

1.59

1.46

-0.13

 

 600 - mob/demob, temp facilities & first fills and spares

5.80

5.15

-0.66

 

Sub Total

96.71

95.89

-0.82

 

GRES have also confirmed that the plant operating costs have not materially changed since the 2012 FEED estimate, with a total operating cost of A$20.29 per tonne of tailings plant feed compared to the 2012 figure of A$19.61/t.  For the PEA, an operating cost for the WRP plant feed of A$24.59/t was assumed, with an allowance made for the impact of lower throughput and for overheads.  From a review of these costs, it does appear that there may be some scope to reduce the tailings processing costs assumed in the Feasibility Study compared to the PEA.

Following completion of the 2015 FEED Update, GRES continue to work on the plant design for the Feasibility Study as it relates to the underground and the combined treatment options.

Processing Costs (A$/t)

FEED 2012

FEED 2015

Delta

Tailings Reclamation

0.65

0.67

3%

Grinding

2.53

2.4

-5%

Flotation

11.1

11.85

7%

Concentrate Dewatering

0.08

0.09

13%

Concentrate Filtering

0.48

0.48

0%

Concentrate Load Out

0.06

0.14

133%

Reagent Mixing and Dosing

0.05

0.05

0%

Process Water

0.14

0.15

7%

Raw Water

0.11

0.11

0%

Tailings Thickening and Disposal

0.2

0.27

35%

Tailings Return & Water Treatment

0.18

0.06

-67%

Air Services Supply & Reticulation

0.15

0.16

7%

Processing Administration

3.83

3.81

-1%

Lighting and Workshop

0.05

0.05

0%

TOTAL

19.61

20.29

3%

TSF4 Design Update

The tailings storage strategy for the combined project is being based upon the work undertaken by Coffey International Limited (“Coffey”) in 2008 as part of the previous WRP Feasibility Study.  The strategy calls for the construction of a new tailings storage facility (“TSF4”), followed by the re-use of the existing Tailings Dam South (“TDS”) facility once sufficient space has been freed following re-processing of the existing tailings material.  Under the combined development scenario of the Feasibility Study, tailings production volumes are expected to be reduced by 30% or more based on the use of a portion of the tailings stream in the production of paste fill material to be used underground.

TSF4 was previously costed (2008) at $1.5 million for the initial construction, and envisaged two lifts over around a three year period.  A tender has recently been issued for an updated design and costings for TSF4 which will feed into the Feasibility Study.

Geotechnical Studies

Under the PEA, Heron proposed a move in the location of the box cut and portal from the east side of the pit to the west side, which would facilitate early mining of the newly delineated shallow E and G Lens positions. Since completion of the PEA, Heron has been working with SRK Consulting to refine the location for the box cut and portal in conjunction with geotechnical advice received from consultants Beck Engineering (“Beck”) and ongoing geotechnical and resource drilling.

Figure 1: Site layout showing the existing pit and the proposed western box cut and decline option.

To view the graphic in its original size, please click here

Beck has conducted an initial desktop review on the ground conditions for the proposed western box cut and decline, concluding that the site is “as good as any that could be found at the mine from a geotechnical perspective”.    Work is ongoing including geotechnical drilling and detailed design for the box cut and decline.  This work includes drilling to understand and plan for the current condition of the existing underground workings.  Drilling has indicated that the natural water table has re-established itself and, as part of the mine access planning, consideration will be given to advancing mine dewatering activities.

Operational Management Plans

The development of the various management plans required under the project approval have been further advanced. In particular the Mine Operations Plan (MOP) is in the final stages of drafting and will be lodged with the Division of Resources and Energy (DRE) in the next few weeks.

As part of the mine access optimisation, the proposed relocation of the portal will alter the site layout. The Company has received advice from the NSW Department of Planning and Environment (“DPE”) that a modification to the existing project approval will be sufficient to address this change to the project plan.

The site layout change will be assessed as a s75W modification to the previous approval. The DPE has provided guidance to be considered in the modification assessment, including in particular interaction with Veolia and Veolia’s operations, revised surface and groundwater assessments, and rehabilitation and contaminated materials management. The Company has now commenced this work prior to submitting the formal modification request.

Funding Options and Commodity Markets

Heron has been exploring options for the staged development of the Woodlawn Project, which contemplated accessing bridge-style funding allowing the commencement of construction of the plant whilst the Feasibility Study was completed. 

Heron is pleased to report that the capital markets were highly supportive of this option, with workable non-binding term sheets received from debt providers, and excellent indications of support from a number of brokers in the Australian, Canadian and European markets.

The cornerstone strategic equity investment by Greenstone Resources LLP announced on 23rd July 2015, undertaken after lengthy due diligence and at a significant premium to market, ultimately reflects the success of this process.

Despite this market support, the Company has observed the recent volatility and general softening in global commodity markets and which Heron considers is likely to delay the closing of a suitable project funding arrangement for a staged development.  As a result, the attractiveness of this option is reduced relative to undertaking a single financing incorporating both the WRP and WUP once the Feasibility Study has been completed.

Despite recent market conditions, forecasters and market commentators have retained their positive views around the zinc market fundamentals, based on a projected deficit supply to demand balance, and in particular supported by the closure of a number of globally significant operations. These closures, along with growing zinc consumption continue to provide a positive backdrop to this commodity market.  

About Heron Resources Limited:

Heron is engaged in the exploration and development of base and precious metal deposits in Australia.  Heron’s primary development project is the high grade Woodlawn Zinc-Copper Project located 250km southwest of Sydney, New South Wales.

For further information, please visit www.heronresources.com.au or contact:

Australia:

Mr Wayne Taylor,

Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer:

Tel: +61 8 6500 9200

Email: heron@heronresources.com.au

Mr Jon Snowball

FTI Consulting

Tel: +61 2 8298 6100 or +61 477 946 068

Email: jon.snowball@fticonsulting.com

Canada:

Tel: +1 905 727 8688 (Toronto)

Technical Information

Table 1: Drill hole details for diamond drill holes completed as part of the Phase II drill campaign.

Hole No.

WMG

East (m)

WMG

North (m)

WMG

RL (m)

Surface
Dip

WMG Surface

Azimuth

Depth (m)

WNDD0020W1

 9,407

 18,951

 2,823

-53

77

 444.7

WNDD0021

 9,013

 19,599

 2,787

-85

130

 319.1

WNDD0022

 9,013

 19,599

 2,787

-78

100

 276.0

WNDD0023

 9,237

 19,227

 2,798

-65

60

 240.0

WNDD0024

 9,285

 19,327

 2,799

-60

90

 82.5

WNDD0025

 9,299

 19,261

 2,801

-60

89

 218.4

WNDD0026

 9,145

 19,407

 2,792

-56

85

 150.0

WNDD0027

 9,204

 19,364

 2,795

-81

85

 44.9

WNDD0028

 9,225

 19,197

 2,796

-58

 83

265.5

WNDD0029

 9,052

 19,298

 2,791

-55

 62

373.7

WNDD0030

 8,882

 19,379

 2,793

-80

 62

699.6

WNDD0031

 8,990

 19,399

 2,792

-70

 71

442.6

WNDD0032

 9,023

 19,338

 2,790

-70

 78

447.5

WNDD0033

 9,053

 19,297

2790

-58

53

260.5

WNDD0034

 8,990

 19,399

2792

-74

62

167.1

WNDD0035

9,053

19,297

2790

-69

71

447.0

WNDD0036

9,012

19,598

2787

-80

118

290.0

WNDD0037

9,024

19,332

2790

-62

58

420.0

WNDD0038

9,053

19,296

2790

-64

76

460.0

WNDD0039

9,051

19,297

2,791

-56

68

381.3

120.8

130.0

119.9

196.1

140.1

78.5

WNDD0040

9,161

19,457

2,789

-55

90

120.8

WNDD0041

9,203

19,379

2,795

-76

50

130.0

WNDD0042

9,254

19,201

2,799

-62

65

119.9

WNDD0043

9,159

19,248

2,795

-60

35

196.1

WNDD0044

9,134

19,409

2,791

-65

96

140.1

WNDD0045

9,235

19,232

2,798

-73

92

78.5

WNDD0046

 8,926

 19,396

 2,793

-73

 92

 451.1

WNDD0047

 9,182

 19,412

 2,793

-59

 78

 116.0

WNDD0048

 9,145

 19,410

 2,793

-59

 90

 135.6

WNDD0049

 9,146

 19,410

 2,793

-70

 78

 145.2

WNDD0050

 9,146

 19,410

 2,793

-55

 92

 130.4

WNDD0051

 9,144

 19,410

 2,793

-61

 99

 140.1

WNDD0052

 9,145

 19,410

 2,792

-67

 117

 135.4

WNDD0053

 8,879

 19,380

 2,793

-56

 110

 501.0

WNDD0054

 9,240

 19,140

 2,800

-58

 71

 207.9

WNDD0055

 9,246

 19,278

 2,798

-69

 66

 120.0

WNDD0056

 9,248

 19,279

 2,798

-69

 60

 110.2

WNDD0057

 9,293

 19,308

 2,800

-60

 65

 87.5

WNDD0058

 9,292

 19,308

 2,800

-60

 65

 87.8

WNDD0059

 9,299

 19,260

 2,801

-80

 48

 165.7

WNDD0060

 8,976

 19,589

 2,792

-58

 54

 463.4

WNDD0061

 9,299

 19,261

 2,800

-61

 125

 201.9

WNDD0062

 9,333

 19,242

 2,804

-63

 79

 171.7

WNDD0063

 9,025

 19,333

 2,790

-65

 50

 352.4

WNDD0064

 9,262

 19,320

 2,798

-74

 80

 90.8

WNDD0065

 9,262

 19,320

 2,798

-69

 80

 81.4

WNDD0066

 9,255

 19,202

 2,799

-55

 65

 115.0

WNDD0067

 9,255

 19,202

 2,799

-72

 42

 81.8

Notes: WMG = Woodlawn Mine Grid

Table 2: Details of massive sulphide intercepts and reported grades from the Phase II drill campaign

Hole No

From (m)

To (m)

Downhole Width (m)

Estimated

True Width (m)

Zn (%)

Cu (%)

Pb (%

Au (g/t)

Ag (g/t)

WNDD0023*

166.8

170.0

3.2

2.6

0.1

1.7

0.0

0.1

5.9

WNDD0024*

30.0

33.0

3.0

2.4

8.5

3.5

5.2

6.3

160.6

WNDD0025*

151.3

153.8

2.5

2.0

1.9

1.2

0.2

3.4

16.5

WNDD0026*

108.7

110.4

1.7

1.0

3.5

6.8

4.9

3.9

213

WNDD0027*

103.8

104.6

0.75

0.6

5.6

8.1

6.8

3.6

398

WNDD0029*

324.3

329.1

4.8

4.0

7.6

0.4

0.9

0.7

37.4

WNDD0029*

340.0

347.15

7.1

6.0

16.9

0.9

11.3

3.5

254.1

WNDD0031*

383.2

403.7

20.5

16.4

8.1

2.4

2.9

0.8

68

WNDD0032*

405.2

417.3

12.1

9.7

4.7

2.2

0.8

0.8

22.2

WNDD0033*

316.7

319.3

2.6

2.1

1.2

0.7

1.4

0.8

76.5

WNDD0033*

326.0

346.7

20.7

16.6

14.1

1

4.7

1.4

120.4

WNDD0033*

351.1

360.0

8.9

7.1

5.8

1.9

2.6

2.7

90.1

WNDD0035

389.7

413

18.9

15.1

0.37

2.1

0.03

0.6

6.8

WNDD0037

347.5

383

35.5

28.4

5.1

0.8

1.3

0.9

61.7

WNDD0038

376.3

396.05

19.8

15.8

0.7

2.6

0.2

0.7

8

 

Notes: True width is an estimate of the actual thickness of the intercept based on interpreted lens orientation (approximately 80% of downhole width); grades are weighted average grades, weighted by length of samples intervals downhole, which are nominally 1 metre. No weighting was applied for differences in specific gravity which is most cases are relatively low. * Previously reported results.

Compliance Statement (JORC 2012 and NI43-101)

The technical information in this news release relating to the exploration results at the Woodlawn Project is based on information compiled by Mr David von Perger, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (Chartered Professional – Geology). Mr von Perger is a full time employee of Heron Resources Ltd. and has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results and “qualified person” as this term is defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). Mr von Perger has reviewed this press release and consents to the inclusion in this news release of the information in the form and context in which it appears.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This news release contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, which are based on expectations, estimates and projections as of the date of this news release. This forward-looking information includes, or may be based upon, without limitation, estimates, forecasts and statements as to management’s expectations with respect to, among other things, the timing and amount of funding required to execute the Company’s exploration, development and business plans, capital and exploration expenditures, the effect on the Company of any changes to existing legislation or policy, government regulation of mining operations, the length of time required to obtain permits, certifications and approvals, the success of exploration, development and mining activities, the geology of the Company’s properties, environmental risks, the availability of labour, the focus of the Company in the future, demand and market outlook for precious metals and the prices thereof, progress in development of mineral properties, the Company’s ability to raise funding privately or on a public market in the future, the Company’s future growth, results of operations, performance, and business prospects and opportunities. Wherever possible, words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “may” and similar expressions have been used to identify such forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the information is given, and on information available to management at such time. Forward-looking information involves significant risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results discussed or implied in the forward-looking information. These factors, including, but not limited to, fluctuations in currency markets, fluctuations in commodity prices, the ability of the Company to access sufficient capital on favourable terms or at all, changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls, regulations, political or economic developments in Canada, Australia or other countries in which the Company does business or may carry on business in the future, operational or technical difficulties in connection with exploration or development activities, employee relations, the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, obtaining necessary licenses and permits, diminishing quantities and grades of mineral reserves, contests over title to properties, especially title to undeveloped properties, the inherent risks involved in the exploration and development of mineral properties, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drill results and other geological data, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins and flooding, limitations of insurance coverage and the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, and should be considered carefully. Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect the Company’s actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company. Prospective investors should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking information. Although the forward-looking information contained in this news release is based upon what management believes, or believed at the time, to be reasonable assumptions, the Company cannot assure prospective purchasers that actual results will be consistent with such forward-looking information, as there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended, and neither the Company nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of any such forward-looking information. The Company does not undertake, and assumes no obligation, to update or revise any such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information contained herein to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be required by law.


No stock exchange, regulation services provider, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained in this news release.

Appendix 1 – JORC 2012 Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data 

(Criteria in this section applies to all succeeding sections)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Sampling techniques

  • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
  • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
  • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.
  • Samples from the diamond-core holes are being taken from mostly HQ3 and NQ3 sized core and sampled on a nominal 1 metre basis taking into account smaller sample intervals up to geological contacts.  The core is cut in half along the core orientation line (where available) and in massive sulphide zones one portion is quartered for assaying, half the core is preserved for metallurgical testing and the remaining quarter is retained as reference material in the core trays.  In non-massive sulphide material half core is sampled.
  • These sampling methods are standard industry methods and are believed to provide acceptably representative samples for the type of mineralisation encountered.

Drilling techniques

  • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details.
  • Diamond-core drilling is being undertaken by Sandvik UDR650 rigs with HQ3 sized core being drilled.  Various techniques are employed to ensure the hole is kept within limits of the planned position.  The core is laid out in standard plastic cores trays.

Drill sample recovery

  • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
  • The core is transported to an enclosed core logging area and recoveries are recorded.  Recoveries to date have been better than 95%.  The core is orientated where possible and marked with 1 metre downhole intervals for logging and sampling.

Logging

  • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.
  • The diamond core is geologically logged by qualified geologists. Geotechnical logging is also being undertaken on selected sections of the core.  Samples for metallurgical testing are being kept in a freezer to reduce oxidation prior to being transported to the metallurgical laboratory.

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation

  • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.
  • All core samples are crushed then pulverised in a ring pulveriser (LM5) to a nominal 90% passing 75 micron. An approximately 250g pulp sub-sample is taken from the large sample and residual material stored.
  • A quartz flush (approximately 0.5 kilogram of white, medium-grained sand) is put through the LM5 pulveriser prior to each new batch of samples.  A number of quartz flushes are also put through the pulveriser after each massive sulphide sample to ensure the bowl is clean prior to the next sample being processed.  A selection of this pulverised quartz flush material is then analysed and reported by the lab to gauge the potential level of contamination that may be carried through from one sample to the next.

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

  • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.
  • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.
  • Sample preparation and assaying is being conducted through ALS Laboratories, Orange, NSW with certain final analysis of pulps being undertaken at the ALS Laboratory in Brisbane QLD.
  • Gold is determined by 30g fire assay fusion with ICP-AES analysis to 1ppb LLD.
  • Other elements by mixed acid digestion followed by ICP-AES analysis. 
  • Laboratory quality control standards (blanks, standards and duplicates) are inserted at a rate of 5 per 35 samples for ICP work.

Verification of sampling and assaying

  • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.
  • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
  • Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
  • An internal review of results was undertaken by company personnel.  No independent verification was undertaken at this stage.
  • All field and laboratory data has been entered into an industry standard database using a contract database administrator (DBA) in the Company’s Perth office.  Validation of both the field and laboratory data is undertaken prior to final acceptance and reporting of the data.
  • Quality control samples from both the Company and the Laboratory are assessed by the DBA and reported to the Company geologists for verification.  All assay data must pass this data verification and quality control process before being reported.
  • Some potential cross contamination between a small number of the samples at the pulverising stage in the laboratory was identified in the assay results for WNDD0033, but is at a level that is not expected to affect the overall result.  Additional sampling and assaying is being undertaken to check the results of these specific samples.

Location of data points

  • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.
  • The drill collars were initially located with a combination of handheld GPS and licenced surveyor using a DGPS system, with accuracy of about 1m.  The final drill collars are “picked up” by a licenced surveyor with accuracy to 1 centimetre.
  • While drilling is being undertaken, downhole surveys are conducted using a downhole survey tool that records the magnetic azimuth and dip of the hole.  These recordings are taken approximately every 30 metres downhole.  Where possible holes are also being surveyed with gyroscopic methods, with some 80 percent of holes drilled in the current program also surveyed by this method after drilling has been completed.

Data spacing and distribution

  • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
  • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
  • Whether sample compositing has been applied.
  • The diamond drilling is mostly following-up in various directions from previous intercepts with a nominal spacing in the range 30-40m.  This drill hole spacing will be sufficient to provide Mineral Resource estimates in the future.

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

  • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.
  • The drilling orientation is designed to intersect the mineralised lenses at a close to perpendicular angle.  The mineralised lenses are dipping at approximately 50-70 degrees to the west and the drilling is approximately at 60 degrees to the east.  This will vary from hole to hole.

Sample security

  • The measures taken to ensure sample security.
  • Samples are being secured in green plastic bags and are being transported to the ALS   laboratory in Orange, NSW via a courier service or with Company personnel/contractors. 

Audits or reviews

  • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.
  • A review and assessment of the laboratory procedures was under taken by company personnel in late 2014 resulting in some changes to their sample pulverising procedure.
Section 2                      Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria

JORC Code explanation

Commentary

Mineral tenement and land tenure status

  • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.
  • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
  • The Woodlawn project is located 250km south-west of Sydney in the state of New South Wales.  The area is near the top of the Great Australian Dividing range and has an elevation around 800m above sea-level.  The mineral and mining rights to the project are owned 100% by the Company through the granted, special mining lease 20 (SML20).  The lease has been renewed to the 16 November 2029.
  • The project area is on private land owned by Veolia who operate a waste disposal facility that utilises the historical open-pit void.  An agreement is in place with Veolia for the Company to purchase certain sections of this private land to facilitate future mining and processing activities.  A cooperation agreement is also in place between Veolia and the Company that covers drilling and other exploration activities in the area.

Exploration done by other parties

  • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.
  • The Woodlawn deposit was discovered by the Jododex JV in 1970 and open-pit mining began in 1978 and continued through to 1987. The project was bought outright by Rio Tinto Ltd. (CRA) in 1984 who completed the open-pit mining. Underground operations commenced in 1986 and the project was sold to Denehurst Ltd in 1987 who continued underground mining up until 1998.  The mineral rights to the project were then acquired by TriAusMin Ltd in 1999 who conducted studies on a tailings re-treatment process and further underground operations.  Heron took 100% ownership of the project in August 2014 following the merger of the two companies.  Some 980 surface and underground drill holes have been completed on the project to date and various studies undertaken.

Geology

  • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralization.
  • The Woodlawn deposit comprises volcanogenic massive sulphide mineralisation consisting of stratabound lenses of pyrite, sphalerite, galena and chalcopyrite.  The mineralisation is hosted in the Silurian aged Woodlawn Felsic Volcanic package of the Goulburn sub-basin on the eastern side of the Lachlan Fold Belt.

Drill hole Information

  • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:
  • A table detailing the drill hole information is given in the body of the report.

Data aggregation methods

  • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.
  • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.
  • The reported assays are weighted for their assay interval width. The majority of the assay interval widths are 1 metre, but this weighting does take into account the non 1 metre intervals and weights the average assay results accordingly.
  • For the results reported here no weighting was included for specific gravity (SG) measurements that have been taken for all sample intervals as the samples within the intervals are of a similar SG.

Relationship between mineralization widths and intercept lengths

  • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.
  • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.
  • The massive sulphide zone intercepted in the drilling to date is at an angle to the drill axis and therefore the true width is estimated to be some 0.8 of down-hole width.  That is, a down-hole intercept of 16m equates to a true width of 12m.  This is only an approximation at this stage and will be better estimated as the orientation of the lenses is better defined.

Diagrams

  • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
  • A long-section showing the hole positions relevant for current phase of exploration is included in the release.  Other maps and diagrams showing the location of the Woodlawn Project are included in other recent Company releases.

Balanced reporting

  • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Results.
  • The reporting is considered to be balanced and all relevant results have been disclosed for this current phase of exploration.

Other substantive exploration data

  • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
  • The drill holes are being cased with either 40 or 50 millimetre PVC tubing for down-hole DHEM surveying which is undertaken on the majority of the holes drilled.
  • Geotechnical logging is undertaken on all core, 25m either side of the massive sulphide lenses.
  • Archimedes method SG measurements are determined for all sampled intervals.

Further work

  • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
  • The second phase of drilling at Woodlawn commenced in May 2015 and will be ongoing until around the end of 2015.  The program is designed to provide the critical drill data for the Mineral Resource definition that will feed into the Feasibility Study now underway.


To view this press release as a PDF file, click onto the following link:
public://news_release_pdf/heron09082015.pdf

Source: Heron Resources Ltd. (TSX:HER, ASX:HRR) http://www.triausmin.com/

Maximum News Dissemination by FSCwire. http://www.fscwire.com

Copyright © 2015 Filing Services Canada Inc.






Bewerten 
A A A
PDF Versenden Drucken

Für den Inhalt des Beitrages ist allein der Autor verantwortlich bzw. die aufgeführte Quelle. Bild- oder Filmrechte liegen beim Autor/Quelle bzw. bei der vom ihm benannten Quelle. Bei Übersetzungen können Fehler nicht ausgeschlossen werden. Der vertretene Standpunkt eines Autors spiegelt generell nicht die Meinung des Webseiten-Betreibers wieder. Mittels der Veröffentlichung will dieser lediglich ein pluralistisches Meinungsbild darstellen. Direkte oder indirekte Aussagen in einem Beitrag stellen keinerlei Aufforderung zum Kauf-/Verkauf von Wertpapieren dar. Wir wehren uns gegen jede Form von Hass, Diskriminierung und Verletzung der Menschenwürde. Beachten Sie bitte auch unsere AGB/Disclaimer!



Mineninfo
Heron Resources Ltd.
Bergbau
-
-
Copyright © Minenportal.de 2006-2024 | MinenPortal.de ist eine Marke von GoldSeiten.de und Mitglied der GoldSeiten Mediengruppe
Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr! Es wird keinerlei Haftung für die Richtigkeit der Angaben und der Kurse übernommen!
Informationen zur Zeitverzögerung der Kursdaten und Börsenbedingungen. Kursdaten: Data Supplied by BSB-Software.