Belmont Resources' JV partner Marquee Resources intercepts thick lithium bearing sediments at Kibby Basin, Nevada
-
The Company has successfully tested the magnetotelluric anomaly at the Kibby Basin Lithium Project and the results from two boreholes (KB 22-01 and KB 22-02) have confirmed high levels of lithium-bearing sediments along with dissolved lithium in the groundwater.
-
Mineralised intervals containing up to 924 ppm lithium with greater than 300 ppm lithium over thicknesses in excess of 450m (1475 ft) have been identified in core samples of clay-rich playa sediments.
-
Lithium mineralization is fairly consistent in both thickness and grade in the two boreholes, TheNewswire - Belmont Resources Inc. ("Belmont"), (or the "Company"), (TSXV:BEA); (FSE:L3L2) welcomes the news that its joint venture partner Marquee Resources Ltd. (ASX: MQR) ("MQR or The Company") announce results from its Kibby Basin Lithium Project 2022 drill campaign. Assay results received indicated thick sequences of lithium-bearing sediments at the Project, with up to 924 ppm Li from the two exploration boreholes (KB 22-01 and KB 22-02) that were completed.
Core Assay Results
Hole KB 22-01 was drilled as a vertical borehole to a depth of 880 m (2888 ft). The hole was drilled as an air-core pre-collar to a depth of 329 (1080 ft), followed by HQ core, reduced to NQ core at 408 m (1338 ft).
As expected, analysis of cuttings from the upper non-core section of the hole indicated weakly anomalous lithium content, ranging from a few 10s of ppm to 154 ppm Li. Drilling switched to core immediately below a hard gravel unit, which forms the boundary between unconsolidated pluvial-fluvial sediments and partially lithified equivalents with substantial tuffaceous (ash) content below. A representative sampling of approximately 10% of the core was split in half using a diamond saw and one split was delivered to Paragon Geochemical in Sparks, NV, an ISO/IEC 17025-2017 certified laboratory, for 31-element ICP analysis, including lithium.
Lithium content increased significantly below the contact, with a 79 m (260 ft)-thick section from 362-441 m (1188-1448 ft) averaging 771 ppm Li with a high of 924 ppm Li. The upper high lithium zone was contained within a very thick zone, averaging 383 ppm Li over 487 m (1597 ft) continuing to the bottom of the hole. The lithium mineralisation is open at depth.
Hole KB 22-02 was drilled as a vertical borehole to a depth of 915.6 m (3004) ft. Similar to the first hole, KB 22-02 was drilled as a mud-rotary pre-collar to a depth of 366 m (1200 ft), followed by HQ and NQ core.
As with the first hole, KB 22-02 encountered anomalous lithium values above the hard gravel and significant lithium enrichment below. A 169 m (555 ft)-thick zone averaging 558 ppm Li with a high of 860 Li lay below the contact. Lithium mineralisation continued to the bottom of the hole with an average of 379 ppm Li over an interval of 451 m (1478 ft). Mineralisation remains open at depth.
Both KB 22-01 and KB 22-02 were drilled to test a thick MT conductor. The start of the high lithium zone in both holes corresponds with the approximate top of the conductor. Neither hole drilled to the bottom of the conductor or the bottom of the potential aquifer zone within the playa-filling sediments.
The results of the core sampling are presented in Table 1.
Preliminary Groundwater Assay Results
Hole KB 22-01 was sampled for lithium-bearing groundwater in the pre-collar interval to a depth of 329 (1080 ft), and the HQ and NQ core intervals to 408 m (1338 ft). Twenty-three intervals were sampled including two long interval, large purge-volume samples and a duplicate for QA. Sample intervals were purged of drilling fluids and cuttings prior to sampling. The general chemical parameters of water samples were measured at the time of collection using a multiparameter chemistry meter. Samples were then sent to a laboratory where they were analysed for a wide range of total and dissolved metals, anions, and general parameters.
Samples from twelve intervals of the upper non-core section of the hole were by means of airlifting groundwater from a short interval of exposed borehole. The non-core hole samples were delivered to ALS Geochemistry in Reno, NV, an ISO 45001-2018 certified laboratory, for 53-element ultra-trace ICP analysis. Eleven samples from the lower core hole were sampled using a large-volume bailer lowered to targeted depths. The core hole samples were delivered to Western Environmental Testing Loratories (WETLAB) in Sparks, NV, a Nevada Division of Environmental Protection accredited laboratory, for 34-element ICP analysis, select anion by Ion Chromatography, and general chemistry analyses.
ALS results from the non-core upper portion of the hole indicated dissolved content up to 0.15 mg/L at 208 m (685 ft). Dissolved lithium content in the eleven WETLAB samples collected in the lower core hole below the gravel unit was below detection levels.
Hole KB 22-02 was sampled for lithium bearing groundwater in the HQ and NQ intervals from 366 m (1200 ft) to 915.6 m (3304 ft). Thirty-six samples were collected and analysed; including several resampled intervals to confirm results and a long interval, large purge volume sample. Sample intervals were purged of drilling fluids and cuttings prior to sampling. The general chemical parameters of water samples were measured at the time of collection using a multiparameter chemistry meter. Samples were then sent to WETLAB, where they were analysed for a wide range of total and dissolved metals, anions, and general parameters.
The lower portion of the KB 22-02 below 817 m (2682 ft) drilled through relatively competent formation material and was sampled by means of a straddle packer system across three intervals. Two samples were from purge water with anomalous chemistry readings. The remaining thirty-one samples were collected using a large-volume bailer lowered to targeted depths following core hole purging.
Twenty-nine water samples were delivered to WETLAB in Sparks, NV for 34-element ICP analysis, select anion by Ion Chromatography, and general chemistry analyse.
The preliminary results of the water sampling from KB 22-01 and KB 22-02 are presented in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.
Click Image To View Full Size Figure 1 - Lithology LogsSummary1
The Kibby Basin Lithium Project is a highly prospective asset located within a 60km radius of North America's only producing Lithium mine, owned by the world's largest Lithium producer, Albemarle. The Kibby Project contains potentially favourable conditions for the development of lithium?rich brines and sediments and has similar features as Clayton Valley which hosts Albemarle Silver Peak Lithium mine.
Adding further excitement to the 2,560 acres (~10sqkm) project is the fact the Project is fully permitted for water extraction for brine processing and production of lithium compounds - a very scarce commodity in the immediate area and will prove extremely valuable should the initial exploration success lead to lithium production.
The company is buoyed by the 7.4km long structure identified in Kibby Valley with characteristics interpreted to be akin to major structures bounding the south side of Clayton Valley, that forms a pull-apart drop-down closed basin within a 700sqkm drainage catch basin.
Location
The Kibby Basin Lithium Project is located 60kms north of Clayton Valley, Nevada which hosts the sole North American producing Lithium mine (Silver Peak Lithium) owned by the world's largest Lithium producer, Albemarle. Marquee's 100% owned Clayton Valley Lithium Project also sits in the Clayton Valley.
Kibby Basin claims and ownership. Kibby Basin Lithium Project Location in relation to Clayton Valley.
Property Geology
The Kibby Basin Lithium Project has similar features as Clayton Valley, Nevada and contains potential favourable conditions for the development of lithium?rich brines and sediments such as; an arid climate, major catch basin, basin has structural traps and is closed, associated igneous or geothermal activity, suitable lithium source rocks and one or more adequate aquifers.
-
Arid Climate
-
Pull?apart drop-down closed basin
-
700 sq. kms drainage catch basin
-
Basin has structural traps and is closed
-
Associated igneous or geothermal activity
-
Suitable lithium source rocks
-
Permitted for Water
Geological highlights of the Kibby Basin that make it potentially favourable to the development of Lithium-rich brines and sediments:
Table 1
Core sampling resultsKB22-01
KB22-02
From
To
Sample length
Li
From
To
Sample length
Li
(m)
(m)
(m)
ppm
(m)
(m)
(m)
ppm
cuttings samples
cuttings samples
0 6.1
6.1
70
6.1
12.2
6.1
80
12.2
18.3
6.1
80
18.3
24.4
6.1
80
24.4
30.5
6.1
80
30.5
36.6
6.1
100
36.6
42.7
6.1
100
42.7
48.8
6.1
140
48.8
54.9
6.1
110
24.4
30.5
6.1
65
54.9
61
6.1
100
54.9
61.0
6.2
65
61
67.1
6.1
90
85.3
91.4
6.1
75
67.1
73.2
6.1
80
115.8
121.9
6.1
96
73.2
79.3
6.1
40
146.3
152.4
6.1
110
79.3
85.4
6.1
100
176.8
182.9
6.1
136
85.4
91.5
6.1
90
207.3
213.3
6.1
144
103.6
109.7
6.1
143
230.3
236.4
6.1
119
134.1
140.2
6.1
122
268.2
274.3
6.1
135
164.6
170.7
6.1
132
286.5
289.5
3.0
130
237.7
243.8
6.1
141
298.7
304.8
6.1
106
298.7
304.8
6.1
154
317.0
320.0
3.0
161
317.0
323.1
6.1
64
329.2
335.3
6.1
165
317.0
323.1
6.1
53
359.6
365.7
6.1
139
split core samples
split core samples
362.1
364.2
2.1
682
365.7
368.2
2.4
318
408.3
413.4
5.1
810
380.4
383.1
2.7
90
413.8
416.9
3.1
924
415.4
418.5
3.0
105
438.1
441.3
3.2
917
427.9
430.7
2.7
108
471.7
474.9
3.2
523
462.7
465.7
3.0
494
505.2
508.4
3.2
151
496.2
499.2
3.0
510
529.6
532.8
3.2
103
525.4
527.6
2.1
860
564.9
571.2
6.3
186
555.0
558.1
3.0
539
587.4
590.7
3.3
219
586.1
587.6
1.5
768
636.2
639.4
3.2
202
629.1
631.8
2.7
345
684.6
687.9
3.3
362
647.7
650.7
3.0
138
663.8
666.9
3.1
251
678.8
681.0
2.3
89
684.9
687.9
3.0
255
708.6
710.8
2.1
144
770.3
773.5
3.2
356
751.9
755.0
3.0
192
753.7
755.9
2.2
115
772.3
775.1
2.7
188
770.5
773.5
3.0
294
809.2
812.3
3.1
200
813.2
815.6
3.1
296
833.0
836
3.0
411
849.7
852.8
3.0
324
868.9
872
3.1
501
873.2
876.3
3.1
311
910.1
913.1
3.0
312
Table 2
Preliminary results of the water sampling KB22-01Sample No.
Depth (ft)
Specific Conductivity
Total Dissolved Solids
Lithium - Dissolved
Lithium - Total
From
To
(?S/cm)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
KB22-01 No. 1
295
300
3200
2530
0.0395
NA
KB22-01 No. 2
355
360
4780
3110
0.0549
NA
KB22-01 No. 3
395
400
1330
860
0.1015
NA
KB22-01 No. 4
415
420
1370
3440
0.0587
NA
KB22-01 No. 5
455
460
2390
1540
0.0752
NA
KB22-01 No. 6
495
500
5580
3620
0.0607
NA
KB22-01 No. 7
555
560
6410
4150
0.0684
NA
KB22-01 No. 8
680
685
1590
1030
0.15
NA
KB22-01 No. 9
735
755
2450
1590
0.1275
NA
KB22-01 No. 10
820
840
2320
1510
0.0792
NA
KB22-01 No. 11
880
900
2730
1780
0.0776
NA
KB22-01 No. 12
980
1000
1090
710
0.0558
NA
KB22-01 No. 13
1124
1134
2254
1830
Pending
Pending
KB22-01 No. 14
1124
2888
2165.2
1850
Pending
Pending
KB22-01 No. 15
1194
1204
2005
1570
Pending
Pending
KB22-01 No. 16
1338
1348
3256
2690
Pending
Pending
KB22-01 No. 17
1338
2888
2956.6
2230
Pending
Pending
KB22-01 No. 18
1447
1457
2957
2270
Pending
Pending
KB22-01 No. 19
1687
1697
2939
2280
Pending
Pending
KB22-01 No. 20
1947
1957
2650
1930
Pending
Pending
KB22-01 No. 21
2207
2217
2834
1600
Pending
Pending
KB22-01 No. 22
2447
2457
3030
2090
Pending
Pending
KB22-01 No. 23
2787
2797
3225
2180
Pending
Pending
Table 3
Preliminary results of the water sampling KB22-02Sample No.
Depth (ft)
Specific Conductivity
Total Dissolved Solids
Lithium - Dissolved Concentration
Lithium - Total Concentration
From
To
(?S/cm)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
KB22-02 No. 1
1198
1208
1888
1227
<0.1
0.116
KB22-02 No. 2
1208
1218
2009
1305
0.285
2.56
KB22-02 No. 3
1238
1248
1942
1262
0.227
1.18
KB22-02 No. 4
1308
1318
2049
1332
0.229
1.11
KB22-02 No. 5
1338
1348
2132
1386
0.235
1.04
KB22-02 No. 6
1378
1388
2176
1414
0.273
1.09
KB22-02 No. 7
1488
1498
2261
1470
0.295
1.18
KB22-02 No. 8
1528
1538
2321
1509
0.327
1.44
KB22-02 No. 9
1578
1588
2470
1605
0.338
2.37
KB22-02 No. 10
1628
1638
2665
1732
0.213
2.15
KB22-02 No. 11
1698
1708
3074
1998
0.355
5.29
KB22-02 No. 12
1728
1738
3200
2080
0.346
10.5
KB22-02 No. 13
1798
1808
3306
2149
0.279
27
KB22-02 No. 14
1848
1855
3384
2199
0.335
10.9
KB22-02 No. 15
2008
2018
3656
2377
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 16
2028
2038
3618
2351
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 17
2058
2068
3648
2371
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 18
2098
2108
3238
2104
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 19
2108
2118
3431
2230
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 20
2248
2314
3063
1991
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 21
2248
2258
3083
2004
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 22
2318
2615
2866
1862
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 23
2328
2338
3136
2039
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 24
2478
2615
2847
1851
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 25
2500
2510
Pending
Pending
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 26
2500
2510
Pending
Pending
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 27
2682
2739.7
2946
1915
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 28
2732
2802.8
3007.5
1955
Pending
Pending
KB22-02 No. 29
2804
3004
2877.1
1881.7
Pending
Pending
Kibby Basin Lithium Claims Permitted for Water
The Kibby Basin lithium property is fully permitted by the state of Nevada to extract a maximum 2,896 acre-feet (944 million gallons) annually of water for brine processing and production of lithium compounds.
Obtaining a water permit for the Kibby Basin lithium project was a major milestone for Belmont where, because of the desert conditions in the region, water is of major importance to any potential mining operation. The Clayton Valley Basin for instance is over-appropriated (current water rights are in excess of water volumes available for an average year) and obtaining water rights for proposed operations is a hurdle that several companies in the Clayton Valley Basin have yet to overcome, even in their advanced stage of development.
Cypress Development (TSV:CYP) recently paid $3,000,000 for a water permit in Clayton Valley (Cypress NR) which allows for the beneficial use of 1,770 acre/feet (577 million gallons) annually of water for mining, milling and domestic use.
About the Belmont/Marquee option/JV Agreement
In November 2021, Belmont announced a Option/JV agreement with Marquee Resources (ASX.MQR) for the Kibby Playa Block, one of six claim blocks on the Kibby Basin owned by Belmont.
The agreement terms are for Marquee to issue Belmont C$100,000 cash upon signing (completed); issue 3,000,000 Marquee shares (1,000,000 issued as of December 10, 2021); and incur C$2,500,000 in exploration expenditures within 15 months of the signing of the Option Agreement in order to earn up to an 80% interest in the Kibby Playa claim block. Belmont retains a 100% interest in the surrounding claim blocks within the Kibby basin.
About Belmont Resources
Belmont Resources has assembled a portfolio of highly prospective copper-gold-lithium & uranium projects located in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Washington and Nevada States. Its holdings include the Come By Chance (CBC), Athelstan-Jackpot (AJ) and Pathfinder situated in the prolific Greenwood mining camp in southern British Columbia. The Crackingstone Uranium project in the uranium rich Athabaska Basin of northern Saskatchewan. The Lone Star copper-gold mine in the mineral rich Republic mining camp of north central Washington State. The Kibby Basin Lithium project located 60 kilometers north of the lithium rich Clayton Valley Basin.
The Belmont project portfolio:
-
Athelstan-Jackpot, B.C. - * Gold-Silver mines
-
Come By Chance, B.C. - * Copper-Gold mine
-
Lone Star, Washington - * Copper-Gold mine
-
Pathfinder, B.C. - * Gold-Silver mines
-
Black Bear, B.C. - Gold
-
Pride of the West, B.C.- Gold
-
Kibby Basin, Nevada - Lithium
-
Crackingstone, Sask. - Uranium
* past producing mine
Click Image To View Full SizeNI 43-101 Disclosure:
The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements as set out in National Instrument 43-101 and has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Robert G. Cuffney, Certified Professional Geologist.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
"George Sookochoff"
George Sookochoff, CEO/President
Ph: 604-505-4061
Email: george@belmontresources.com
Website: www.BelmontResources.com
We seek safe harbor. Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. The TSX Venture Exchange has not approved nor disapproved of the information contained herein.
1 Kibby Basin Property Gavity Survey Basin Model, James L. Wright M.Sc. 26 June 2016
-